Make ausculture.com your own. Post your content.
Register at http://www.ausculture.com/register
ausculture.com makes the following plea to musicians everywhere - put an end to Sedate Rock!
You know what I’m talking about. The kind of rock music that puts you in a coma, it’s so innocuous. Now, it’s not bad per se, it probably makes quite pleasant background music, and it might even come with decent lyrics, who knows? It could very well be performed by an artist with credibility coming out his or her arse. However, it’s the inoffensiveness of the tune that actually offends me. Where’s the limb? Why aren’t you out on it?
Sedate Rock has insidiously spread itself across the globe with the ferocity and strength of a particularly bad strain of herpes. But who exactly is behind it, and what’s caused the outbreak?
Two things spring to mind straight away - surfers, and Dido.
Dido is the driving force behind Sedate Rock’s cousin which is even more horrible in the eyes of some - Sedate Pop. Thirty-something mothers and sensitive new age men went out in droves to purchase Dido’s brand of sleep-inducing pop, thrusting both her albums “No Angel” and “Life For Rent” to the top of the charts. Her collaboration with naughty rapper Eminem gave her credibility in the eyes of those with none. “But of course she’s cool and hip! She sang with that rapper bloke who says naughty words! It doesn’t GET much more street than that!” Did it matter to the gazillions out there who purchased the album that she sounds like a cat in labour as she whinges about one thing after another? Well, of course not. They barely listened, just played it in the back ground of their dinner parties. They then purchased Norah Jones’ “Come Away With Me” so they could tell people how into jazz they were. It is many of these wannabe-hip record buyers who went on to catch a nasty case of affection for Sedate Rock.
But what about the surfers? How are they to blame? To put it simply, they want to listen to music around campfires on the beach while they get stoned. Which is a valid lifestyle choice, of course, and sometimes quite a pleasant thing to do! So in between catching waves and smoking joints, they started swapping tapes of Jack Johnson’s music. Jack Johnson is probably a nice guy. His music is nice. His lyrics are nice. He performs on stage wearing t-shirts and jeans. Isn’t that nice? So down to earth! BUT WHAT IS EXCITING ABOUT HIM?! Diddly squat, my friends. But hey - I didn’t mind. Diversity is nice in music, isn’t it? And stoner-surf music has it’s place. If his fans don’t seem to mind he’s playing the same song with different words each time, so be it. So Jack Johnson starts selling a crap load to surfers, which in turn led to the exposing of the Sedate Rock virus to millions more on the radio and on MTV. There was a market out there, and out came droves of Sedate Rock pushers from their verandahs and onto the charts.
In Australia, on the heels of the Jack Johnson success, came others. Pete “Would you like a sedative or a song - why not have both?” Murray arrived on the Australian charts with his tune “Feeler”. A great tune, no doubt. Lovely. He followed it on with “Lines” - not as good, but not half-bad. But then came the Sedate Rock anthem - the frustratingly dull “So Beautiful”. If listening to a beefy bloke whine slowly over a monotonous chord progression about some silly wench is your cup of tea, so be it. I personally had never heard anything more stagnant in my life. And for some bizarre reason, people loved it. It was heard constantly on radio and bars added Pete Murray to their jukeboxes where it was played almost as much as The Best Of Cold Chisel. Boozy corporate folks who popped into the pubs across the city after work selected it to show just how on the pulse they were when it came to rock. But this isn’t rock! It’s not even slow rock! It’s just slow, painfully, hurtfully slow.
Pete can write a tune - “Feeler” proved that. But he’ll need to pull out a big gun for his next single in order for me to forgive him for inflicting “So Beautiful” on me. But he’s not the only one, not by far. John Mayer also hit the Sedate Rock big time with “Your Body Is A Wonderland”. Surfers continued to buy Jack Johnson, and even managed to encourage Ben Harper to explore his bland side with “Two Hands” and “Diamonds On The Inside”. More beach bums armed with acoustic guitars came out of the woodwork and can now be seen playing their tepid brand of rock n roll in pubs across the city. They might be talented musicians but they all sound the same!
There are countless more people behind Sedate Rock that I can’t be bothered to acuse. Sedate Pop also thrives on the charts. Where’s the excitement, people? It’s nothing against acoustic stuff, or even slow music - I’m quite partial to Coldplay (though some argue they’re pioneers of Bedwetting Rock - I disagree personally) and I love Ryan Adams to bits. I can’t quite explain what makes something slow and beautiful, and what makes another song slow and banal, despite me managing to write loads on this topic in an attempt to - but to paraphrase Justice Potter Stewart’s comment regarding pornography - I can’t pinpoint exactly what makes something Sedate Rock, but I know it when I hear it. And I want it to end!
Top Three Sedate Rock Songs
Pete Murray - So Beautiful
Jack Johnson - Taylor
Dave Matthews Band - Gravedigger
Comments
Whoa, I've never thought about it this way, but yeah I've never been a fan of this type of music but never hated it enough to rant about it. You've made a good point there. Really, that stuff is only good in moderation. I do like "Diamonds on the Inside" by Ben Harper, but there's not much else that I like from him. Same goes for some of the said performers in your rant. They're good, but really do you want to delve into an endless swoon of misery and sorrow? Maybe you do - but that just means you're just really really sad.
Liven up your lives and listen to something more upbeat... like The Strokes, or something with OZ flavour like ... GAH! I can only think of Sedate Rock songs now! >:-(
Bring on some old school Jebediah, Eskimo Joe, Spiderbait, Little Birdy... anything!
Posted by: antzpantz | June 6, 2004 3:12 AM
So true, worst is when you walk into any shop (just to buy something simple) and realise that all the 'variety' and 'new' radio stations they have playing in the background seem to have this stuff set on repeat. I mean, I can put up with bad music if I haven't heard it before, but this is horrible, I never thought mundane acts could get any more mundane.
Posted by: snave | June 12, 2004 2:27 AM
Music to commit suicide to....Considering terminal diseases, war etc don't seem to be working very effectively, Sedate Rock might prove useful in culling the population.
Posted by: Rell | June 21, 2004 12:09 AM
I love you
Posted by: Jimbo | July 12, 2004 1:39 PM
There is one sedate rock band that have been around for an unfortunately long time. A lot of sad, sad people seem to like them but I hate them with a passion.....Radiohead. I don't disagree with their words but they bore me to tears
Seriously, they have nice poetic lyrics but where is the melody, the rhythm or any other of the main elements you'd hear in a GOOD rock song?
If you are a long time insomniac, listen to 3 radiohead songs in a row and I guarantee you'll drop off into a deep sleep.
Posted by: Michael Challis | July 25, 2004 12:56 PM
You've probably got a point regarding the latest Radiohead offerings - I still enjoy them but can admit they ARE rather boring and pretentious at times, as unhip as that is to say.
But I can forgive them anything due to The Bends - proper tunes! Unashamed rawk! That's why I'm rather uncool and could never get a job* at one of those proper music magazines like Rolling Stone or Q or the defunct (I think) Juice - I'll always rate The Bends FAR more highly than I rate OK Computer, Kid A etc...
*Amongst other reasons which include my laziness and inability to write without using commas or hyphens excessively.
Posted by: Jess | July 25, 2004 5:40 PM
Sedate rock is Matchbox Twenty.Jack Johnson/Pete Murray/Norah Jones et al are not sedate rock,as they are not 'rock' at all....they are folk.I dont think anyone was calling people like Joni Mitchell/Nick Drake etc 'sedate' versions of the Rolling Stones back in the day.Comparisons are chalk and cheese,Beethoven and Britney Spears.You probably like Coldplay and Ryan Adams because they ARE rock.
Posted by: Sean | August 2, 2004 12:03 AM
Matchbox 20 aren't Sedate Rock - shite rock, I suppose, depending on your taste, but certainly not sedate. Pete Murray would classify as rock, not 'folk' in my ears - So Beautiful, while an acoustic tune, is still a song from someone who is undoubtedly rock?! Jack Johnson wouldn't really classify as 'folk' either in my books, despite his favouring of an acoustic guitar. Probably he'd be part of a whole new genre emerging of sedate surfer rock... As for Norah Jones, she's hardly 'folk' either, more pop-jazz with a tinge of country-blues at moments. Ha! Label-a-rama!
Again, it's all incredibly subjective, but the reason I don't compare Nick Drake to the Rolling Stones is because Nick obviously IS folk music. Pete Murray is about as folk as Peter Andre.
As for Coldplay and Ryan Adams, I'd say Coldplay are more rock\pop and Ryan Adams (at least, the period of Ryan Adams I was referring to - the slow, acoustic, sad song period he's pursuing a little less in favour of a more English-flavoured rock sound) was alt-country more than he was ever rock.
Of course, labels are a bastard aren't they? One man's cheesy pop ballad is another's life changing, heart-string-tugging work of art. I just wrote the above article because I was bored to be honest - both of my day job, and "So Beautiful" :)
Posted by: Jess | August 2, 2004 12:41 AM